Journal of AdvancedMedical and Dental Sciences Research

Background: The present study was conducted occurring with Propofol and Etomidate during general anesthesia. Materials & methods: 200 participants in all were enrolled in the current investigation. The 200 subjects who met the inclusion requirements were split into two study groups of 100 each after being broadly and randomly assigned: Group A included subjects who received an injection of 1% propofol, while Group B included subjects who received an injection of 0.3 mg/kg etomidate. All of the patients' comprehensive demographic information was gathered. The pain experienced during injection was recorded on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 denoting no discomfort and 10 denoting the most intense pain. All of the results were entered into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet, and then SPSS software was used to analyses them. Results:While comparing the mean arterial pressure and heart rate among the subjects of both the study groups at different time intervals, no significant difference was observed. However; while comparing the mean arterial pressure and heart rate among subjects of both the study groups at the time of induction. Mean pain score was found to be significantly higher in group A in comparison to group B. Conclusion: Among patients with associated altered hemodynamic status, etomidate is an improved option.