Journal of AdvancedMedical and Dental Sciences Research

Background:Endotracheal intubation stands as the benchmark for airway management during the administration of general anesthesia. This study aims to assess and compare the intubating conditions achieved using the Airtraq laryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope in elective adult surgical patients.Methods:A prospective study conducted at a hospital involved 100 adult patients who met the inclusion criteria and willingly participated after providing informed consent in the Department of Anesthesia. Following the initial assessment, patients were transferred to the operating room, where intravenous lines were established, and monitoring devices were connected. The assignment of patients to either the Airtraq or Macintosh group was determined through the use of sealed envelopes.Results:Our study revealed a comparison of the mean age, sex distribution, and Body Mass Index (BMI) among patients in both groups. The results indicated no statistically significant differences between the two groups in these parameters.Conclusion:In summary, our study concludes that the Airtraq laryngoscope presents a novel approach to tracheal intubation, particularly in cases involving anticipated and unanticipated difficult airways. The Airtraq demonstrated a notable reduction in the difficulty of tracheal intubation and the level of hemodynamic stimulation when compared to the Macintosh laryngoscope.